What is Monitoring?
Monitoring is the process of collecting and analyzing predefined metrics from systems, applications, and networks to assess their performance and overall health. It involves setting up alerts and thresholds to detect when specific issues arise. Monitoring is typically rule-based, where known parameters, such as CPU usage, memory consumption, and response times, are tracked. These metrics help IT and DevOps teams understand system performance and quickly respond to any anomalies or disruptions in service.
Monitoring systems are often limited to surface-level insights, meaning they detect when something is wrong but don’t always provide detailed information on why the issue occurred. For example, monitoring might tell you that your CPU usage is at 90%, but it won’t explain what’s causing that spike.
What is Observability?
Observability is a broader concept that refers to the ability to understand a system’s internal state based on the outputs it generates, such as logs, traces, and metrics. It goes beyond simple monitoring by providing deeper insights into the “why” and “how” of system behaviors, especially in complex, distributed environments. Observability combines three main data types—metrics, logs, and traces—to offer a more holistic view of what’s happening inside the system.
With observability, teams can proactively investigate unknown issues, uncover hidden patterns, and trace root causes of problems that aren’t tied to specific, predefined metrics. Observability enables more informed decision-making and faster troubleshooting by focusing on capturing rich data and analyzing how system components interact in real time.
Accelerate development, minimize bugs, and streamline delivery with our Trusted DevOps services. Our experts will seamlessly integrate your development and operations teams to boost efficiency, shorten product lifecycles, and ensure faster time-to-market. Get in touch for a consultation today.
Difference Between Observability vs. Monitoring
While observability and monitoring share the goal of improving system reliability, they differ significantly in scope, purpose, and methodology.
1. Predetermined vs. Unknown
- Monitoring is based on predetermined metrics. You decide in advance what data to collect and set thresholds for alerts. It works well for known problems but struggles to detect issues outside of predefined parameters. For example, monitoring will alert you if CPU usage exceeds a set threshold but won’t identify an unforeseen issue caused by a microservice malfunctioning.
- Observability, on the other hand, is designed to explore unknowns. Instead of limiting insights to predefined metrics, observability captures diverse data points like logs, traces, and metrics to provide a full picture of system behavior. This helps uncover unknown issues, as it allows engineers to query data after the fact to diagnose any unexpected or emerging problems.
2. Reactive vs. Preemptive
- Monitoring is more reactive. When monitoring detects a metric exceeding a threshold, it triggers alerts and requires the team to take action. This approach often means waiting for something to break before responding, leading to potential downtime or reduced service quality.
- Observability is preemptive. By providing detailed insights into how different system components interact, it allows teams to identify and address issues before they become full-blown problems. With observability, engineers can ask exploratory questions, trace root causes, and pinpoint weaknesses before they impact users, leading to faster incident resolution and improved system resilience.
3. Plain Data vs. Actionable Insight
- Monitoring provides plain data, which tells you whether the system is performing as expected but doesn’t always offer actionable insight. The collected metrics are static and predefined, leaving you to diagnose the root cause manually after an issue is detected.
- Observability transforms data into actionable insights. With rich context from logs, traces, and metrics, observability helps you connect the dots between symptoms and causes. It enables deep querying of system data, allowing for better analysis of system behavior, patterns, and anomalies, which ultimately leads to faster and more effective troubleshooting.
Use Cases for Monitoring and Observability
- Monitoring Use Case: Monitoring is highly effective for simple, stable environments or for systems where performance is largely predictable. For example, a traditional web server might be monitored to track uptime, request volume, and latency. Predefined thresholds can trigger alerts if the server becomes overloaded or goes offline.
- Observability Use Case: Observability shines in complex, distributed, or microservices-based architectures. In environments with many interdependent services (e.g., a microservice architecture running on Kubernetes), observability helps teams understand the relationships between services, track request flows, and trace system behaviors across services. It is particularly useful for dynamic, cloud-native environments where unexpected issues can arise, and more in-depth, real-time analysis is needed to resolve problems efficiently.
By combining Monitoring with observability, organizations can ensure they cover both known issues with predetermined metrics and proactively diagnose unknown problems in their systems. This leads to more reliable, resilient applications and faster incident response times.
